A key strategic decision has emerged in the ongoing conflict, as Donald Trump urged Israel to avoid striking oil and energy infrastructure inside Iran, despite escalating military operations.

According to multiple reports, the request was driven by three major concerns from Washington.

First, U.S. officials believe that attacks on oil facilities would severely harm civilians, as energy infrastructure directly impacts daily life. Strikes on refineries and fuel depots had already caused toxic smoke and environmental damage in major cities, raising humanitarian concerns.

Second, the U.S. is aiming to avoid a mᴀssive regional escalation. Officials warned that hitting oil infrastructure could trigger retaliation against Gulf energy sites, including those in Saudi Arabia and other key producers, potentially expanding the war across the region.

Third, there are global economic risks. The conflict has already disrupted the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global oil supply. Further attacks on energy infrastructure could send oil prices soaring and destabilize global markets.

In addition, reports indicate that Trump views strikes on oil facilities as a “last resort” option, to be used only if energy infrastructure in the Gulf is directly targeted first.

Recent developments also show that the U.S. temporarily paused its own strikes on energy targets to support possible negotiations and reduce pressure on global markets.

The move highlights a careful balance between military pressure and economic stability, as the conflict continues to intensify while efforts to prevent a wider energy crisis remain in focus.