Back to the Future Part II decided to take a few years off of Doc Brown, and there’s actually an interesting reason behind the choice. After the smash-hit success of 1985’s Back to the Future, the sequel followed a few years later and finds Doc and Marty traveling to the distant year of 2015 to save his future son, only to cause ripples in the timeline that they have to travel back in time to fix. Unlike the straightforward plot of the original, BTTF Part II utilized the full possibilities of time travel for a sprawling story across generations.
While Part II‘s version of 2015 is somewhat cheesy and dated a decade after that year actually happened, the sequel managed to build upon the ideas of the original. It may be somewhat overstuffed, but Back to the Future Part II was just what was needed to keep the franchise going and bridge the gap between the first film and the eventual threequel in 1990. Not unlike many other sequels, Part II also made some small tweaks to the movie’s universe, including de-aging Doc Brown so that he no longer looks his actual age.
The Back to the Future franchise includes:
Movie |
Release Year |
Rotten Tomatoes Score |
---|---|---|
Back to the Future |
1985 |
93% |
Back to the Future Part II |
1989 |
63% |
Back to the Future Part III |
1990 |
79% |
Back To The Future Part II Avoided Having To Age-Up Christopher Lloyd As Doc Brown
The Production Saved Time & Money By De-Aging Doc For Part II
Shortly after Doc, Marty, and Jennifer arrive in 2015, the eccentric scientist reveals that he has gone to a rejuvenation clinic that has taken 30 to 40 years off his life. He then removes a mask and looks exactly like he did when he was 30 years younger. The mask was to prevent the youngsters from being startled by a significantly younger visage, but he never really explains why he chose to be rejuvenated in the first place. It can be ᴀssumed that Doc Brown just wanted to feel younger, but there was a real-life reason that’s actually pretty logical.
The movie doesn’t specify if Doc Brown went to a rejuvenation clinic in 2015, or if he traveled further into the future to receive the procedure.
The rejuvenation process makes Doc around the same age as Christopher Lloyd actually was in 1989, meaning the actor wouldn’t have to undergo the process of getting his old-age makeup applied every day. Unlike the first film, which features the 1955 Doc predominately, Back to the Future Part II follows the 1985 Doc, who was much older. This was an added expense for the sequel, but also an added annoyance for Christopher Lloyd, who would have to spend a few extra hours in the makeup chair each day. Though the films were blockbusters, cost-saving is always important in Hollywood productions.
There was also forethought put into the decision, because a rejuvenated Doc Brown was soon to have his own love story in Back to the Future Part III. The threequel takes the time travelers to the 1880s, where Doc falls in love with Mary Steenburgen’s Clara Clayton, a woman significantly younger than 1985 Doc Brown. Though age gaps weren’t uncommon in cinema then and now, it doesn’t make sense for a man his age to father children. Since the movies were sH๏τ back-to-back, it’s clear that the de-aging decision in Part II also had Part III in mind as well.
Back To The Future’s “Rejuvenation Clinic” Line Also Feels Like A Tongue-In-Cheek Joke
The Movie Acknowledges The Rushed Nature Of Doc’s De-Aging
the de-aging of Doc Brown was clearly a practical decision and not something that necessarily serves the plot in any immediate sense.
There’s no doubt that the rejuvenation clinic line is shoehorned into the script, but Back to the Future Part II laughs it off with tongue-in-cheek humor. Practical choices are made in cinema frequently, and the de-aging of Doc Brown was clearly a practical decision and not something that necessarily serves the plot in any immediate sense. It’s also quite funny because the changes to Christopher Lloyd’s face are tiny at best, and the makeup for older Doc wasn’t even that meticulous to begin with. Even though he’s 30 years older in ’85, he never really looked like it.
The mask that Doc wears at the beginning of Back to the Future Part II is a replica of his appearance in 1985, where he would presumably be in his late 60s or 70s. When contrasted with Christopher Lloyd’s real appearance underneath the mask, it becomes abundantly evident that Doc was already aging better than most. Except for his stark white hair, Doc Brown never really looked like a man of advanced age, and certainly not like someone who was 30 years older than when Marty met him in 1955.
Back to the Future Part II‘s rejuvenation clinic line is the quintessential example of a mulligan in storytelling, and it offers a clever wink to the audience. The success of Back to the Future was something of a surprise, and they likely weren’t thinking about making sequels during the first film’s troubled production. However, the opportunity to continue the story necessitated some changes, and Doc Brown’s trip to the rejuvenation clinic is as humorous as it is practical.