Happy Gilmore remains an early highlight of Adam Sandler’s career, but there are some harsh truths about the nearly thirty-year-old movie that ring harsher in the modern day. The film stars Sandler as the тιтular Happy, a wannabe hockey player with a fiery temper and a good heart. Discovering a surprising adaptability to golf, Happy shifts to the sport to save his grandmother’s house. The comedy also stars Carl Weathers, Julie Bowen, and Christopher McDonald, and remains a deceptively sweet-hearted slapstick sports comedy.
There are some elements of the film that are a lot harsher under a bit of modern scrutiny, however. That’s part of what makes the announcement that a Happy Gilmore sequel is currently in development all the more exciting, as Sandler’s beloved early comedy has plenty of room to explore. Some deceptively heavy moments in the film are brushed aside, including how quickly Happy’s own flaws would have further complicated his situation. Here are the harshest realities of Adam Sandler’s Happy Gilmore characters and story from a modern perspective.
10
Happy Gilmore Isn’t Such A Trailblazer Compared To Modern Sports
Happy’s Bravado Would Feel Right At Home In The Modern Day
Many elements of Happy Gilmore would feel out of place in the modern world, especially Happy’s quick ascent in the world of sports. One of the big draws of Happy Gilmore is seeing the volatile and blue-collar Adam Sandler character dealing with the inherent stuffiness of the golfing world. Compared to most of his compeтιтion, Happy’s bombastic personality stands out and earns him mᴀssive popularity with the sport’s fanbase. Happy would have a number of peers in that regard today, however.
Happy’s goofy overconfidence and overwhelming skill are closer to the bravado and emotion seen in modern sports. Happy’s outbursts would likely feel right at home alongside the taunting taking place across leagues. Looking back, Happy’s surprising in-universe popularity would now likely be the result of his antics going viral, spreading out across social media. Happy’s uniqueness as an openly emotional player in the film feels more representative of modern athletes than it did in 1996.
9
Happy’s Subway Connection Wouldn’t Be As Likely
Happy Would Have A Lot Of Subway Compeтιтion
When Happy initially seems unable to procure the money necessary to save his grandmother’s house, he ultimately turns to Subway for a lucrative sponsorship deal. Happy notably pulls this off incredibly quickly, earning the money with a commercial spot. However, Subway has become much more commonplace for athletic sponsorship. Since Happy Gilmore premiered, major athletes like Steph Curry, Simone Biles, Marshawn Lynch, Derek Jeter, and more have worked with Subway to promote their restaurant chain.
This means that Happy’s sudden realization that he can turn to Subway feels less like a goofy realization and more like a typical athletic branding deal. There’s also the fact that, in retrospect, Happy would be unlikely to earn that commercial appearance so quickly, especially with the number of other competing athletes who could take that sponsorship instead. It makes the sudden success of the commercial and the windfall it produces for Happy less believable in a unique way.
8
Happy’s Anger Problems Shouldn’t Be Brushed Aside
Happy Can Actually Be Pretty Scary
Happy Gilmore’s temper is one of the biggest character flaws the character works to overcome. When the movie was initially released, it was an easy way for the film to highlight his immaturity and pᴀssion. From a modern perspective though, Happy’s outbursts are far more problematic. At various points in the film, Happy lashes out at people and even openly curses out his own equipment. It’s volatile and even fundamentally worrying behavior to see on display, especially on such a large televised stage.
Although he eventually learns to restrain himself and finds inner peace thanks to Chubb’s mentorship, Happy’s anger makes him a genuine threat to others around him. The character suddenly ᴀssaults a lot of characters in the film, which would cause a host of problems in the modern day. While they may vary in intent or maliciousness, the other characters in the film are right to call him out for letting loose so furiously on others in a public space, and Happy’s need to overcome that is something reflected in Adam Sandler’s idea for Happy Gilmore 2.
7
Happy’s Mission To Save His Grandmother’s House Feels A Lot Harsher (And More Realistic)
The Relatable Nature Of The Dilemma Is Not As Funny Now
At the core of Happy Gilmore is a mission to save his Grandmother’s house. Early in the film, it’s revealed that Happy’s Grandmother hadn’t paid her taxes for years, leading the IRS to repossess the house to auction it off. It’s a humanizing beat that helps give Happy a genuine reason to throw himself into the world of golf.
In the years since, however, that sort of event has become a far more pressing matter in the real world. Multiple financial crises have occurred in the United States (and across the globe at large ) that have resulted in countless families losing their homes. In the 21st century, Happy’s efforts to save his grandmother’s house at all costs feel much more real than they did upon release.
The fact that the house is almost immediately auctioned off beyond what Happy can pay for is another sadly realistic element of the modern housing market that gives the film an extra bit of emotional punch. Happy being forced to take on a job he initially hates, just so he can save a family member’s home, hits a lot closer to home for most audiences than it did when the film was first released.
6
Adam Sandler Hadn’t Reached His True Acting Potential Yet
Happy Gilmore 2 Will Show Adam Sandler Who Has Grown As An Actor
When Happy Gilmore came out, Adam Sandler had primarily established himself in broad comedies like Billy Madison or sketch comedy shows like Saturday Night Live. This is reflected in Happy Gilmore, where Sandler plays Happy with a broad emotional core. He’s a volatile character with a vulnerable side, steadily developing a calmness that wins him the day. Sandler does fine in the role but is best when the movie lets him go big and goofy. However, Sandler has since proven to be a deceptively impressive dramatic actor, with a far wider range than characters like Happy Gilmore initially suggested.
Films like The Wedding Singer and Big Daddy highlight how Sandler could blend his cartoonish antics with a more compelling and grounded character. Punch Drunk Love and Uncut Gems further showcased his dramatic chops, subverting his archetypical characters for great dramatic effect. Sandler gives a solid performance in Happy Gilmore, but his later films highlight how much more Sandler could have brought to the character (and hopefully will with the upcoming return to the character in Happy Gilmore 2).
5
Happy Gilmore Could Be Justifiably Fired Or Arrested
Happy Commits A Lot Of ᴀssault
Happy Gilmore’s outbursts are usually played for laughs in Happy Gilmore, but the character honestly does more than enough violent things to be justifiably fired or even arrested. Before he even becomes a pro athlete, Happy’s first attempt at a golf swing knocks a woman out of her house and sends her tumbling to the ground. This would make him liable for any injuries she suffered.
Before then, he’d attacked a coach for mocking him. He casually threatens characters like Shooter in public. It all builds to the film’s iconic fight with Bob Barker, which almost gets Happy kicked off the pro tour. While no charges are brought against him and his popularity with young audiences ensures he’s only suspended for his violent antics, it’s genuinely surprising from a modern perspective that Happy didn’t face consequences for his outbursts.
It’s one of the more exciting elements of a prospective Happy Gilmore 2. Happy’s previous actions that were brushed aside in the past would likely be grounds for far more scrutiny in the modern day, highlighting the importance of his continued growth.
4
Shooter Is A Mᴀssive Jerk (And No One Truly Calls Him On It)
Shooter Does Some Genuinely Cruel Things In Happy Gilmore
Christopher McDonald’s Shooter McGavin is the antagonist of Happy Gilmore, an over-confident and vindictive golfer who comes to see Happy as a threat to his belief that he’s overdue for glory. While some characters call out Shooter for his personality and he ultimately gets his comeuppance at the end of the film, Shooter honestly gets away with most of his abuses. A popular golfer in his own right, Shooter’s mean-spirited jabs are largely allowed by the higher-ups who could (and should) call him out, making his anger at Happy all the more hypocritical.
His casually Sєxist treatment of Virginia is never commented on, with the pro tour’s high-ranking media liaison forced to take Shooter’s snide requests for a soda or updates about his jacket size. Shooter also plays a part in actively sabotaging an opponent and is untimely the one responsible for getting Happy run over by a car in the middle of a tournament.
That feels like a genuine crime that Shooter’s never called out on. Shooter may fail to win the tournament and is implied to be physically beaten by the end of the film (another example of the violence that feels out of place in modern comedies), but there’s no acknowledgment that he’ll actually face genuine consequences for his actions.
3
Happy Getting Hit By A Car Is Brushed Over Way Too Quickly
When Happy Gilmore Becomes Too Much Like A Cartoon
During the climactic game between Happy and Shooter, the former’s surprising improvement in his short game earns him an advantage. To that end, Shooter brings back Donald to try and complicate the game for Happy. Donald escalates to an extreme, driving his car onto the golf course and running Happy over. It’s an over-the-top beat that seems especially egregious from a modern perspective, where drivers suddenly shooting forward have proven to be fatal threats.
The fact that the event is quickly brushed off so quickly and Happy almost immediately resumes playing (albeit with some initial difficulty) is when the movie’s sense of reality becomes most elastic. The film brushes the moment off and uses it to bring Happy back down at a climactic moment. In light of other public events where drivers used their cars to attack people in public spaces, this moment feels especially grim — especially because Donald is shown fleeing the scene and ultimately faces no clear consequences for his actions by the end of the film.
2
Ben Stiller Is Quietly Horrifying In Happy Gilmore
Ben Stiller Just Gets Away With Some Pretty Horrifying Behavior
Ben Stiller appears in Happy Gilmore in a relatively minor role as Hal, a senior community administrator. While he overtly presents himself to Happy as a kindly and empathetic soul, in reality, he’s a cruel taskmaster who threatens Happy’s grandmother with physical violence. He abuses the elderly, forcing them to craft goods he can sell while pocketing all the money. Those who talk back are forced to take part in physical labor and are openly threatened. It’s a dark gag that ultimately goes nowhere, as the character disappears after the focus shifts away from the retirement home.
Similar to Donald and Shooter, the villainous Hal ultimately doesn’t seem to pay any true consequences for his actions, which feels especially galling when he justifiably should have drawn Happy. While Shooter is at least beaten up and there’s a chance Donald is caught after hitting Happy with his car, Hal’s crimes may remain a secret. This could allow him to continue abusing the elderly in his care, which feels like an unusually bitter truth about the film, making his potential return in Happy Gilmore 2 more important than almost any other minor character in the original film.
1
Happy’s Father Is Missing From The Final Scene
A Weird Omission In Happy Gilmore‘s Ending
One of the most glaring parts of Happy Gilmore comes at the end of the film. In the movie’s final moments, Happy reflects on his life and looks to the heavens. Above the clouds, he sees the image of Chubbs, as well as the alligator that Happy was eventually able to get revenge on. Abe Lincoln is also there, smiling down at Happy. However, Happy’s father is missing from the sH๏τ, which feels like a wasted opportunity in retrospect.
Happy’s relationship with his father was a big part of the character’s origins, and his premature death in Happy’s childhood led him to his grandmother’s care. Seeing his father smiling down at him alongside another mentor figure like Chubbs would have been a sweet final touch to the scene. Instead, the absence of Happy’s father feels especially weird and undercuts the otherwise sweet and goofy ending of Happy Gilmore in a surprisingly harsh turn.
Other Adam Sandler Movie Moments That Don’t Hold Up
Adam Sandler remains one of the most beloved comedic actors of all time and many of his movies are still hilarious even when rewatched years later. However, as with any comedy star who has been around for several decades, some moments in Sandler’s movies haven’t aged well. While this doesn’t necessarily ruin the films for fans who want to revisit them, or for younger fans looking to check out Sandler’s earlier works, it is hard to overlook some of these moments now.
Billy Madison was Sandler’s breakout role, and like Happy Gilmore, is often seen as one of his funniest movies. It is a hilarious and silly romp with Sandler playing another immature manchild. However, while it is funny to laugh at many of his antics, the moment he gropes his teacher on a dare is off-putting. Interestingly, the movie highlighted it as problematic at the time, with Billy initially refusing, saying “That’s ᴀssault, brother.”
Another Sandler movie that makes an unfortunate Sєxual joke that is hard to look past is Anger Management. The movie features the unlikely but fun team-up of Sandler and Jack Nicholson as an anger management patient and his counselor, respectively. However, one sequence sees the two men confronting Sandler’s childhood bully, who is now a peaceful monk, with Nicholson trying to rile the man up by lying that Sandler’s character made inappropriate advances on his developmentally disabled sister, which is a fairly appalling idea in a comedy scenario.
The entire movie is filled with “gay panic” comedy, which many will surely find offensive and unfunny.
Perhaps the Sandler movie that has aged the worst is I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry, which stars Sandler and Kevin James as heteroSєxual firemen who pose as a gay couple to get better benefits. The entire movie is filled with “gay panic” comedy, which many will surely find offensive and unfunny. However, the most egregious scene is during the characters’ thrown-together wedding officiated by Rob Schneider, playing an Asian character in a way that would have been considered offensive and outdated long before this movie came out.
