Warning: SPOILERS For Star Trek: Section 31
The answer to one big problem in Star Trek: Section 31 is found in the return of Captain Worf (Michael Dorn) in Star Trek: Picard. As part of Star Trek: Picard season 3’s Star Trek: The Next Generation cast reunion, Commander Raffi Musiker’s (Michelle Hurd) mysterious handler is revealed to be none other than Captain Worf. Commander Musiker ᴀssumes that Worf is also working for Starfleet Intelligence, but Worf explains that he’s more of an “independent contractor.” Given Worf’s long history with both Starfleet and the Klingon Empire, this unites Worf’s loyalties with one job.
Ever since being introduced in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Section 31 has been different from Starfleet Intelligence. While Starfleet Intelligence is the Federation’s standard espionage division, Section 31 was a black ops intelligence team that didn’t answer to Starfleet Command, and wasn’t bound by the Federation’s code of ethics. As a refugee from the Mirror Universe, Michelle Yeoh’s Terran Emperor Philippa Georgiou was a perfect candidate to join Section 31 in Star Trek: Discovery season 2. One big problem in Star Trek: Section 31 is that Georgiou’s new team doesn’t have that morally gray nuance.
Section 31’s Team Of Misfits Could Have Been Star Trek Independent Contractors (Like Worf)
Once Again, A Star Trek That’s Improved By Worf (Sort Of)
The team of misfits in Star Trek: Section 31 could have been independent contractors, like Captain Worf is in Star Trek: Picard. It’s unclear why Alok Sahar’s (Omar Hardwick) team in Section 31 actually has to be Section 31 at all when their mission isn’t as morally gray as Section 31 typically is. Lieutenant Rachel Garrett (Kacey Rohl) is even there to ensure that they don’t kill anyone. But Worf’s job in Picard season 3 proves that Starfleet Intelligence does use operatives who don’t work for them directly and aren’t necessarily bound by strict Federation ethics.
Star Trek: Section 31‘s Rachel Garrett is the subject of an Easter egg in Star Trek: Picard season 3, episode 1, “The Next Generation”, when Raffi Musiker discovers a statue of USS Enterprise-C Captain Garrett is the target of an impending terrorist attack.
Making Section 31’s team independent contractors would solve one of Star Trek: Section 31‘s problems: its unexpected tone. Star Trek established that Section 31 operates in the shadows of Federation ethics, even when Section 31 is an open secret in Star Trek: Discovery. Instead of being morally gray characters on ethically dubious missions, Star Trek: Section 31‘s team are more like Star Trek superheroes. If the Section 31 team doesn’t actually operate like elite black ops, they should be independent hires for specific missions—then they can be as fun as Star Trek: Section 31 made them out to be.
Star Trek’s First Streaming Movie Didn’t Have To Be тιтled Section 31
Changing The тιтle Of Star Trek: Section 31 Would Have Changed Expectations
Star Trek‘s first streaming movie didn’t have to be тιтled Star Trek: Section 31. Star Trek has traditionally used Section 31 as a branch of Starfleet to tell stories that ask whether the ends justify the means. But Section 31‘s story doesn’t seem to deal with any genuinely unethical covert operations, or wrestle with the same questions of morality that Section 31 stories did in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine or Star Trek: Discovery. They don’t even have to be Section 31 to bring Georgiou in, because Georgiou’s connection to the Godsend is more important than her Section 31 past.
If Star Trek: Section 31 was renamed when the new Star Trek TV show was retooled into a streaming movie, that would have changed what audiences expected from Michelle Yeoh’s return as Emperor Georgiou. Shifting the scope of Section 31 probably removed some big picture themes that would’ve linked the story back to Section 31 in the greater Star Trek universe. With a new тιтle, and changing the team to independent contractors hired to recover Georgiou’s Godsend weapon, Star Trek: Section 31 still wouldn’t be the greatest Star Trek movie, but it might have been received differently.