There have been some outstanding movie trilogies over the years, but certain film series may have been better if they had called it quits at just one. While we all can appreciate the power of all-time great trilogies like Back to the Future and The Lord of the Rings, other franchises just didn’t have the fuel to go the distance.

Some trilogies have two good movies and one disappointing entry, like The Godfather, but there are others that peaked at the very start and never quite managed to reach those heights again. Even with all-time great directors involved, all of these series would have a much better legacy had they been just one single film.

Fantastic Beasts (2016 – 2022)

David Yates and J.K. Rowling came together for the highly anticipated Harry Potter spin-off film, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, which follows the exploits of the magizoologist Newt Scamander around the Wizarding World in New York City and beyond. As an interesting side story, Fantastic Beasts‘ biggest mistake was trying to become a series in its own right.

With three films in total, Fantastic Beasts tried to shoehorn in the stories of Dumbledore and Grindelwald while also haphazardly continuing Newt’s adventures. A much better approach would have been anthology films, which would have allowed Rowling to expand upon her Wizarding World without making these films feel overstuffed.

Blair Witch (1999 – 2016)

The Blair Witch Project was one of the most influential horror movies of all time, as its undeniable impact on the found footage genre informed everything from Cloverfield to Paranormal Activity. With a clever marketing campaign that made some believe it was actually all real, the power of this film is undone by the existence of sequels.

Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 made a huge mistake by discarding its found footage style in favor of a traditional narrative, which took away the series’ unique idenтιтy. The third movie, simply тιтled Blair Witch, was also a total letdown that didn’t deliver nearly the same amount of scares as what made the original so iconic to begin with.

Men In Black (1997 – 2012)

The sci-fi action franchise Men in Black was based on a comic book series by Lowell Cunningham and starred Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones as agents in a secretive government organization investigating UFOs. With a unique premise and exciting world-building, the joy of the original Men in Black was slowly uncovering the truth of its world.

The sequels lacked the magic of the original, with Men in Black II undoing Agent K’s arc and offering little for viewers to get excited about. Smith and Jones returned in 2012 for a lackluster finale, while 2019’s spin-off Men in Black: International failed to reignite the series. None of the follow-ups come close to matching the original.

Cars (2006 – 2017)

Pixar has one of the best reputations of any animation studio, but it’s with the Cars series that they started to hit some bumps in the road. While the first Cars was a fun-filled adventure aimed at younger viewers, the sequels felt more like an excuse to embrace the merchandising opportunities of the franchise than a genuinely necessary series.

Cars 2 stands as perhaps Pixar’s weakest film, and Cars 3 felt like the franchise was running on empty creatively. While most other Pixar franchises have cross-generational appeal, Cars lacks the universality of series like Toy Story and Inside Out, and when it comes to ranking this studio’s series, it sadly stands at the bottom of the scrapheap.

Escape Plan (2013 – 2019)

While most will be aware of Sylvester Stallone’s franchise work on series like Rocky, Rambo, and The Expendables, they might not be aware that he also starred in the Escape Plan trilogy. With a fun first film that paired Stallone with his old rival, Arnold Schwarzenegger, the original Escape Plan was a treat for longtime lovers of the 1980s action movies.

However, later installments in this prison escape series were less notable and featured Stallone alongside a less iconic supporting cast, including 50 Cent and Dave Bautista. These direct-to-video sequels were pretty forgettable, and, looking back, it’s clear that this series should have just been a one-and-done film.

The Hangover (2009 – 2013)

Few movies have had their legacy ruined more by unnecessary sequels than The Hangover, a film that would have gone down in comedy history had they left it as just one single movie. Instead, this story of a group of friends known as the Wolfpack retracing their wild night was needlessly expanded with not one but two sequels.

The Hangover Part II and Part III are prime examples that Hollywood will milk a successful property for all its worth, whether audiences want it or not. With repeated jokes and an increasingly tiresome premise, The Hangover didn’t need any sequels, and much like the friends’ wild night of debauchery, we should also try to forget their existence.

Taken (2008 – 2014)

Liam Neeson kick-started a new era in his career as an action star with the iconic thriller Taken. As the story of a retired CIA operative by the name of Bryan Mills using his particular set of skills to take the men who kidnapped his teenage daughter, not only did Taken give the world endless hilarious memes, but it also stood out as a genuinely great movie.

The problem starts with Taken 2, a film that simply retreads the same story beats as what came before. Taken 3 pretty much followed the exact same formula, and we were left with three near-identical movies that didn’t add anything of note and whose legacy would be far stronger if it had never gotten the franchise treatment.

Now You See Me (2013 – 2025)

The thriller series Now You See Me explored the clever premise of illusionists using their stage productions to enact elaborate heists and robberies. With an all-star cast including Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, and Mark Ruffalo, this unique concept was clever at first, but the magic was lost in the sequels.

Perhaps Now You See Me’s biggest mistake was naming its sequel the bland Now You See Me 2, only to wait until the third film to finally use the obvious subтιтle Now You Don’t. The first movie was fun, but the concept didn’t need expanding, meaning the sequels just offered diminishing returns and only weakened the original’s charm.

The Hobbit (2012 – 2014)

The original Lord of the Rings trilogy stands as one of cinema’s greatest accomplishments, and that’s because Peter Jackson took three outstanding fantasy books and transformed them into a film series that enthralled viewers. However, when he tried to do the same thing with The Hobbit, it was a total disaster.

The reason The Hobbit doesn’t work as a trilogy is that Jackson was adapting one short novel, and these movies were forced to stretch a reasonably simple story across three overlong films. Had The Hobbit just adapted its source material into one single movie, we would have all liked it a lot more.

Jurᴀssic Park (1993 – 2001)

Steven Spielberg wowed audiences like never before with the visual spectacle of Jurᴀssic Park back in 1993. This outstanding depiction of CGI dinosaurs pushed modern technology to its absolute limit and highlighted the potential of grand visuals on the big screen. With a compelling sci-fi concept, it’s no surprise that Spielberg returned for a rare sequel with The Lost World.

The original Jurᴀssic Park trilogy concluded with Joe Johnson’s Jurᴀssic Park III in 2001, but everyone can agree that neither movie holds a candle to the original. The overwhelming success of Jurᴀssic Park meant that sequels were inevitable, but the truth is that the first film got everything perfect, and its continued existence has always been underwhelming.

​