Henry Cavill’s Casino Royale audition has finally leaked – and proves he just wasn’t ready to play James Bond. Cavill made an impression early in his career when he auditioned for high-profile roles like Bruce Wayne/Batman in Batman Begins or Superman in 2006’s Superman Returns. Of course, he later played Superman in several DCU movies, but probably his most famous near miss was his audition for James Bond reboot Casino Royale. Reportedly, the final choice came down to Cavill or Daniel Craig, with producers ultimately opting for the latter.

Speaking with The Express in 2023, Casino Royale director Martin Campbell said of Cavill that “He looked great in the audition. His acting was tremendous.” However, the director also conceded that “He just looked a little young…” when it came to producers making the final decision. Following Daniel Craig’s Bond exit with No Time To Die, there has been much speculation about who the next 007 will be. Names like Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Regé-Jean Page keep being linked, while Cavill is seemingly part of every single list of Bond candidates.

Henry Cavill’s Leaked Casino Royale Audition Proves He Was Too Young To Play Bond

Cavill lacked the world-weariness needed for 007

After many years of hearing how strong his reading was, Henry Cavill’s Casino Royale audition has finally appeared online. Before this audition, the 22-year-old Cavill had appeared in the likes of Hellraiser sequel Hellworld or The Count of Monte Cristo, but he hadn’t much experience with leading roles. The audition is fascinating for several reasons, since the young Cavill clearly has something, and it makes sense he was up for such major roles despite a lack of credits. However, the Casino Royale audition tape also makes it clear Cavill was far too young.

This James Bond movie may find the character at the beginning of his 00 career, but he’s still lived a life prior to that. There’s already a cynicism and world-weariness to 007 in Casino Royale, but Cavill wouldn’t have had the experience to convincingly portray that. Cavill had an undeniable charisma and charm, but he was too babyfaced for what the role demanded. The film could have been tweaked to suit a younger actor and that may have made for an interesting movie in its own right – but it feels like Casino Royale took the best approach.

Daniel Craig Was Perfect For Casino Royale

Craig was at just the right age for 007

The notion of a prequel that found Bond at the beginning of his 00 service had been suggested as a debut for Timothy Dalton’s version. It was ultimately decided that it would be a bad idea to have a film where the character lacked his usual suaveness or combat skills, so this was rejected. Casino Royale fixed this prequel problem by establishing that Craig’s Bond was already in his late 30s when he became an agent and had gone through military training.

Taking Bond’s backstory into account, Craig was the best choice for the part. He’s got the charisma and Sєx appeal, in addition to looking like he could annihilate any opponent in a fight. The reasons Craig was right for the film also highlight why Cavill was wrong. He looked and felt too young and innocent, and needed more miles on the clock both as an actor and a person before he could take on that role.

Henry Cavill Would Make For A Great James Bond Now, But He Has The Opposite Problem

It feels like Cavill has been stealth rehearsing for Bond for 20 years

Cavill wasn’t ready for Bond when he read for Casino Royale, but he would nail the part now. A decade later, his portrayal of another iconic spy in 2015’s The Man from U.N.C.L.E. proved his 007 potential to everyone, while his roles in both Argylle and The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare featured multiple hat tips to the James Bond saga. While he was clearly too young for Casino Royale, the issue with casting Cavill as the next Bond now is that, at age 41, he might be too old.

Speaking with AP, franchise producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson stated the next James Bond will likely be in their 30s, so they can star in at least three movies. The franchise has historically looked for actors who don’t already have famous characters on their resumes too; in Cavill’s case, he’s got Superman and Geralt of Rivia. It could even be argued that Cavill’s casting would be too obvious of a choice, especially as he’s already played variations on the part.

On the flip side, Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan were already in their 40s when they were cast, so Cavill shouldn’t be discounted just yet. Even the Casino Royale audition marked him out as a talent to watch – and he has made good on that early promise. Whether he’ll finally get a chance to show the world what his James Bond looks like is another matter entirely.

Source: Express.co.uk, AP