Why Remake Of Matthew Broderick’s Oscar-Nominated ’80s Sci-Fi Movie Didn’t Happen Explained By Director

The director behind a remake of a Matthew Broderick movie explains why it never came to fruition. Broderick has enjoyed a long and notable career in Hollywood. His career began in the 1980s with Max Dugan Returns, and he quickly evolved into a worldwide sensation. He starred in 1986’s Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, which earned $70 million on a $5 million budget and would eventually be preserved in the Library of Congress. He then went on to appear in The Lion King, Godzilla, and Inspector Gadget. Throughout those years, he also appeared on stage and won two Tony Awards within 15 years.

Broderick’s best movies may have come in the 20th century, but the new millennium also offered him new opportunities. He claimed roles in The Producers, Bee Movie, and The Tale of Despereaux, while appearing in scattered cameo roles on TV. The actor even appeared in Only Murders in the Building, where he played himself. It was the ’80s and ’90s when Broderick enjoyed his greatest level of prominence, however. Recently, one of those ’80s hits nearly returned for a remake. Unfortunately, it never came to pᴀss.

WarGames Nearly Had A Modern Remake

It Would Have Focused On New Technology

1983’s WarGames was Broderick’s breakout hit. He played David Lightman, a young hacker who nearly started a nuclear war after gaining access to the military’s computer systems. The movie was a runaway success, earning $125 million at the box office against a budget of just $12 million. It managed to earn three Academy Award nominations, though it won none. It even managed to educate the public about computer hacking, while tying into the resounding fears of nuclear annihilation. WarGames recently nearly received a remake by director Seth Gordon (Horrible Bosses).

WarGames was directed by John Badham, who also worked on Point of No Return, Dracula, and Saturday Night Fever.

All hopes for a new movie were eventually dashed, and the project was scrapped. In an interview with Collider, Gordon explained that the movie was meant to follow the Stuxnet virus, which was a computer bug that severely damaged the Iranian nuclear program. Gordon believes that the topic is still relevant today, but that “they weren’t feeling it at that time,” which ensured that the project “didn’t ever really gain the momentum that it needed to.” Check out his explanation below:

That was at a time when it was the guys from Spyglᴀss that were running MGM at the time, and I had a take on it that was about Stuxnet and that whole world of basically cyber terror and where things could head. I just feel like they weren’t feeling it at that time, and so it didn’t ever really gain the momentum that it needed to. I love the story and the approach, and hey, I gotta say, it’s still relevant. Like everything that happened with [Sandworm] a couple of years ago. It’s frightening. I feel like something’s going to happen in the next four years very relevant to that because the GRU is still in full effect.

Our Take On The Scrapped WarGames Movie

It’s The Right Decision But A Rare One


Two characters looking in awe at a computer screen in WarGames

The WarGames remake would have been a fascinating look into a new world of cyber terror. However, it would not have nearly the same effect as the first version. The original movie was fascinating, because it came early in the computing era. The internet was still a tool that was fresh and new, which made hackers extraordinarily interesting. In the modern era, however, it would not have nearly the same impact. With the number of upcoming movie reboots for 2025, it is nice to see just one movie that will remain untouched. Leaving it alone is the right decision.

Source: Collider

Related Posts

Back In Action Brilliantly Used Its Actors Against You

Back In Action Brilliantly Used Its Actors Against You

Warning: Major spoilers for Back in Action below!Back in Action’s cast elevates the latest Netflix action comedy – and uses the audience’s knowledge of their previous roles…

Keke Palmer’s New Comedy Breaks An 11-Year-Old Rotten Tomatoes Record Even Two Recent Acclaimed Hits Couldn’t

Keke Palmer’s New Comedy Breaks An 11-Year-Old Rotten Tomatoes Record Even Two Recent Acclaimed Hits Couldn’t

Keke Palmer’s new comedy One of Them Days has broken a Rotten Tomatoes record. The movie, which was produced by Insecure‘s Issa Rae, was directed by Lawrence…

Back In Action’s Michael B. Jordan & Creed Jokes Explained

Back In Action’s Michael B. Jordan & Creed Jokes Explained

Back in Action‘s many references may seem like unᴀssuming jokes, but the quips referencing Michael B. Jordan and Creed have a semblance of meaning. By the time…

After Meryl Streep & Anne Hathaway, The Devil Wears Prada 2 Can’t Happen Without Justice For One Original Character

After Meryl Streep & Anne Hathaway, The Devil Wears Prada 2 Can’t Happen Without Justice For One Original Character

The Devil Wears Prada is now joining the trend of long-awaited sequels, and though it obviously needs its two main actresses to properly happen, it also needs…

7 Years Later, The DCEU’s Biggest 3 Movies Make 4 Upcoming DCU Releases Look Even More Promising

7 Years Later, The DCEU’s Biggest 3 Movies Make 4 Upcoming DCU Releases Look Even More Promising

3 of the biggest releases in the DC Extended Universe make 4 of the new DC Universe’s upcoming releases particularly promising. The DCEU was, sadly never consistently…

Why Glinda’s Name Is Pronounced “Galinda” In The Wicked Movie

Why Glinda’s Name Is Pronounced “Galinda” In The Wicked Movie

The 2024 adaptation of Wicked presented something odd: characters pronounce Glinda’s name as “Galinda.” Wicked was one of the year’s top critically acclaimed movies, bringing with it…